Jeff Danziger: You Gotta Know When to Hold 'em, Know When to Fold 'em...

Mine Safety Agency Was "Negligent" In Protecting Utah Miners

The Labor Department's Inspector General said Monday that the federal agency responsible for ensuring the safety of the nation's coal miners was "negligent" in protecting the workers at the Crandall Canyon mine in Utah, the Salt Lake Tribune reports:

The Mine Safety and Health Agency also could not ensure that its approval of the mining plan at the Utah mine was free of undue influence by the mine's operator, Murray Energy, the Inspector General says in a report issued Monday.

MSHA responded to the report that the word "negligent" was misleading and expressed concern that the independent investigating arm of the Labor Department was implying its decisions were affected by undue influence.

But the Inspector General says its findings "remain unchanged."

The report found that:

MSHA was negligent in carrying out its responsibilities to protect the safety of miners. Specifically, MSHA could not show that it made the right decision in approving the Crandall Canyon Mine roof control plan or that the process was free from undue influence by the mine operator. MSHA did not have a rigorous, transparent review and approval process for roof control plans consisting of explicit criteria and plan evaluation factors, appropriate documentation, and active oversight and supervision by Headquarters and District 9 management. Further, MSHA did not ensure that subsequent inspections assessed compliance with, and the effectiveness of, approved plans in continuing to protect miners. MSHA and mine operator officials worked together to develop rescue plans related to the August 2007 tragedy, with MSHA exercising final approval authority over all activities. MSHA, however, lacked guidance on appropriate non-rescue activities.

United Mine Workers of America President Cecil Roberts released a statement saying:

We've argued for years that many at the upper levels of MSHA are more interested in helping mine operators increase production than they are in helping miners stay safe. The Kennedy report and the OIG report both blow the lid off the internal workings of the agency, exposing for all to see what actually happens and confirming what we've said.

[FatWallet] PANASONIC 1080p 42" Plasma $1,098.00 FRYS + SHIPPING

Rating: 0 Posted By: vrundmc Views: 3 Replies: 0 RIPPED FROM SD!LINK!Shipping should only be about 105$this model comes with a pedestal stand which is worth 250$, the 750 U which has 1 more HDMI port does not have the stand and its more money. Same tube, same anti glare coating.PANASONIC TH-42PZ700UPANASONIC:FRYS.com #: 52903271080p High-Def Resolution for Crisp, Lifelike Details The extremely high 1920 x 1080 pixel count of this plasma TV allows for its incredible 1080p HD display capability, which provides twice the number of pixels as 720p HDTV displays for superior detail and extraordinary HDTV reproduction.this is better than the Costco version of this deal at 1150 as there is no tax if there is no frys in your state.#1 rated 1080 set in 42" plasma category According to CRretails 1,900- 2500 when new, now discontinued for more expensive but identical model. Why buy a plasma TV?To get more screen for your money. Inch for inch, plasma offers more bang for the buck than an LCD TV, so the same budget can buy you a bigger screen. 1080p screens might be an exception; plasma sets with "full HD" resolution tend to be priced similarly to LCD models.To enjoy a movie-theater experience. A good plasma TV's deep black levels and high contrast can do justice to almost anything you watch, including movies and TV programs with dark scenes. The strong contrast and realistic, accurate colors can result in rich, natural-looking images, especially in dim lighting. Most LCD sets have trouble displaying the same strong, dark blacks as plasma sets. On certain LCD sets, uneven brightness from the backlight can create cloudy areas that can be distracting in dark scenes.For a wide viewing angle. With a plasma TV, as with the familiar picture-tube set, the images onscreen look the same from almost any angle. That's a big plus if a TV will be watched by a number of people sitting around a room.It's a different story with LCD TVs. Most LCDs still look their best only from a limited sweet spot in front of the screen. A few new models have successfully addressed this, and they have a wider viewing angle than the typical LCD. (See: Why buy an LCD TV?)Generally, as you move off to the side, the picture quality on an LCD screen deteriorates, appearing increasingly washed out or dim. Vertical position also matterssay, if you're sitting on the floor or watching an LCD set that's mounted above a mantelpiece. On some TV sets, those problems can be obvious, especially with indoor scenes and flesh tones. The degradation is less noticeable with bright images and vivid colors such as those you'd see in a football game.Because TVs in retail showrooms often display sporting events, you might not notice a problem with viewing angle when looking at a TV in a store. Picture settings also minimize the effect of viewing angle on picture quality. TVs are usually set to vivid or dynamic mode, which pumps up brightness and color to a level that looks great under fluorescent lights but unnatural in a typical home. Ask a salesperson to reset a TV to normal or standard mode and tune in nonsports programming to get a better idea of how a TV might look at home, especially from an angle.More Online Coupons from Fatwallet.com.